4.7 Review

Motor neuron-derived induced pluripotent stem cells as a drug screening platform for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.962881

关键词

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs); drug screening; in vitro disease model; 3D cell culture; bioinformactics; motor neuron; differentiation

资金

  1. National Institutes for Health [1R35 GM134864]
  2. Passan Foundation
  3. Ministry of Health of Brazil [325000.475256/2017-54]
  4. INOVA FIOCRUZ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development and study of cell culture models that replicate the characteristics of nervous system diseases are crucial for drug discovery and treatment advancement. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology provides an opportunity to create neuronal pathology models due to the difficulty in obtaining neuronal tissues. This article focuses on iPSCs derived from patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and explores the process of obtaining motor neuron-derived iPSCs (iPSC-MNs), current 3D models, and the potential of bioinformatics in finding new pharmacological treatments.
The development of cell culture models that recapitulate the etiology and features of nervous system diseases is central to the discovery of new drugs and their translation onto therapies. Neuronal tissues are inaccessible due to skeletal constraints and the invasiveness of the procedure to obtain them. Thus, the emergence of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology offers the opportunity to model different neuronal pathologies. Our focus centers on iPSCs derived from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients, whose pathology remains in urgent need of new drugs and treatment. In this sense, we aim to revise the process to obtain motor neurons derived iPSCs (iPSC-MNs) from patients with ALS as a drug screening model, review current 3D-models and offer a perspective on bioinformatics as a powerful tool that can aid in the progress of finding new pharmacological treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据