4.4 Article

Relative submajorization and its use in quantum resource theories

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS
卷 57, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4972295

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (through the National Centre of Competence in Research Quantum Science and Technology)
  2. European Research Council [258932]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [258932] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce and study a generalization of majorization called relative submajorization and show that it has many applications to the resource theories of thermodynamics, bipartite entanglement, and quantum coherence. Relative majorization is an ordering on pairs of vectors induced by stochastic transformations: One pair of vectors relatively majorizes another when there exists a stochastic transformation taking the former to the latter. Relative submajorization is a weakened version in which a substochastic matrix need only generate a vector pair obeying certain positivity conditions relative to the input pair. In the context of resource theories, we show that the relative submajorization characterizes both the probability and approximation error that can be obtained when transforming one resource to another, also when assisted by additional standard resources such as useful work or maximally entangled states. These characterizations have a geometric formulation as the ratios or differences, respectively, between the Lorenz curves associated with the input and output resources, making them efficient to compute. We also find several interesting bounds on the reversibility of a given transformation in terms of the properties of the forward transformation. The main technical tool used to establish these results is the linear programming duality, which is used to show that any instance of relative submajorization can be dilated to an instance of strict relative majorization. Published by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据