4.6 Article

Cerebellar transcranial current stimulation - An intraindividual comparison of different techniques

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.987472

关键词

cerebellum; plasticity; tRNS; tACS; tDCS; TMS; IMU

资金

  1. Clinician Scientist Program of the Section of Medicine of the University of Luebeck [CS08-2020]
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) via the Clinician Scientist Program of the Clinical Scientist School Luebeck (CSSL) [DFG-GEPRIS 413535489]
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [430054590, WE5919/2-1]
  4. Pharm Allergan
  5. Ipsen
  6. Merz Pharmaceuticals
  7. Actelion
  8. Foundations Possehl-Stiftung (Luebeck, Germany)
  9. Margot und Juergen Wessel Stiftung (Luebeck, Germany)
  10. Tourette Syndrome Association (Germany)
  11. Interessenverband Tourette Syndrom (Germany)
  12. CHDI and Damp-Stiftung (Kiel, Germany)
  13. German Research Foundation [DFG] [1692/3-1, 1692/4-1, SFB 936, FOR 2698, 396914663, 396577296, 396474989]
  14. European Reference Network-Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND) [739510]
  15. Else Kroener-Fresenius foundation (EKFS) [2018_A55]
  16. German Research Foundation [SFB 936, FG 2698]
  17. Ipsen Pharma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcranial current stimulation techniques can induce cortical plasticity. The cerebellum, an important relay in the motor system, is a promising target for plasticity induction. This study compared the effects of different tCS methods on cerebellar plasticity and found that 50 Hz tACS was the most effective in changing corticospinal excitability.
Transcranial current stimulation (tCS) techniques have been shown to induce cortical plasticity. As an important relay in the motor system, the cerebellum is an interesting target for plasticity induction using tCS, aiming to modulate its excitability and connectivity. However, until now it remains unclear, which is the most effective tCS method for inducing plasticity in the cerebellum. Thus, in this study, the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), 50 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (50 Hz tACS), and high frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) were compared with sham stimulation in 20 healthy subjects in a within-subject design. tCS was applied targeting the cerebellar lobe VIIIA using neuronavigation. We measured corticospinal excitability, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI), and cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) and performed a sensor-based movement analysis at baseline and three times after the intervention (post1 = 15 min; post2 = 55 min; post3 = 95 min). Corticospinal excitability increased following cerebellar tACS and tRNS compared to sham stimulation. This effect was most pronounced directly after stimulation but lasted for at least 55 min after tACS. Cortico-cortical and cerebello-cortical conditioning protocols, as well as sensor-based movement analyses, did not change. Our findings suggest that cerebellar 50 Hz tACS is the most effective protocol to change corticospinal excitability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据