期刊
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 29, 期 23, 页码 3860-3865出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1149563
关键词
Antibiotics; early onset sepsis; infection; newborns; sepsis calculator
Objective: To compare actual antibiotic use to the stratification based on the sepsis calculator in newborns with suspected early onset sepsis (EOS). To investigate differences in EOS risk and vital signs between newborns that received early (<12h) versus late antibiotics (12h of life).Methods: Newborns born 34 weeks gestation in 2014 treated with antibiotics started within 72h after birth were included. We calculated the risk per 1000 live births and retrospectively assigned each newborn to one of four recommended categories using the sepsis calculator.Results: There were 2094 newborns, 111 (5.3%) received antibiotics and 108 newborns were included. The incidence of culture-proven EOS was 0.096%. In 57 newborns, the advice of the sepsis calculator was not to start antibiotic therapy. Antibiotic treatment was started early in 66 (61%) and late in 42 (39%) newborns. In the late treatment group, clinical condition deteriorated, including two newborns with culture-proven EOS. Tachypnea and respiratory distress were significantly more present.Conclusion: Antibiotic use could be reduced by more than 50%. Newborns with initial low sepsis risk score clinically deteriorated beyond 12h of life. Continuous good clinical observation remains very important. Prospective validation is necessary to evaluate the safety of this approach.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据