4.3 Review

The Effect of Health Literacy Intervention on Patients with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013078

关键词

health literacy; diabetes; meta-analysis; systematic review; intervention

资金

  1. Major Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province [2021SJZDA055]
  2. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX21_3105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies on the effects of health literacy (HL) intervention on patients with diabetes revealed that such intervention can lower glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and improve medication adherence, while the impact on diastolic blood pressure improvement is not significant. Self-efficacy increased and HL levels were enhanced.
Relevant studies published between January 2010 and June 2021 were identified through relevant databases, including the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) database of Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase, in order to assess the effect of health literacy (HL) intervention on patients with diabetes. A total of 21 articles were eligible. The results showed that: (1) this review involved different HL assessment tools, most of which were self-designed scales and assessment tools focused on measuring functional HL. (2) The differences in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.94, -0.62) and medication adherence (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.85, 95% CI: 0.19, 3.52) between the HL intervention group and the usual care group were statistically significant. There was no significant improvement in systolic blood pressure (SMD = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.34, 0.25). Furthermore, this review reported that self-efficacy (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.65, 1.04) was increased, and the level of HL was improved. In the assessments of risk of bias, 90% of the studies were classified as medium. The quality of the evidence of medication adherence was very low, and the reliability of the conclusions was not enough to confirm the effect of HL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据