4.6 Article

Improved Plasticity of Fe25Co25Ni25(Si0.3B0.7)25 High Entropy Bulk Metallic Glass through the Addition of Cu

期刊

ACTA METALLURGICA SINICA-ENGLISH LETTERS
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 417-425

出版社

CHINESE ACAD SCIENCES, INST METAL RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1007/s40195-022-01457-9

关键词

High entropy alloys; Bulk metallic glasses; Glass forming ability; Nano-crystallization; Plasticity; Microstructure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work focused on enhancing the plasticity of Fe25Co25Ni25(Si0.3B0.7)(25) high entropy bulk metallic glass (HE-BMG) by adding minor amounts of Cu. The appropriate addition of Cu significantly improved the plasticity, while excessive Cu addition had a negative effect. The observed alpha-Fe (Co, Ni) clusters in the alloys with 0.3 and 0.6 at.% Cu were responsible for the improved plasticity. However, the plasticity rapidly deteriorated when the Cu content exceeded 0.9 at.% due to the precipitation of alpha-Fe (Co, Ni) and Fe (Co, Ni) B compound grains.
This work was focused on enhancement in the plasticity of Fe25Co25Ni25(Si0.3B0.7)(25) high entropy bulk metallic glass (HE-BMG) by adding minor Cu (0-1.2, in at.%). It is found that the appropriate addition of Cu can efficiently improve the plasticity of the present HE-BMG while the excessive addition of Cu will deteriorate again the plasticity, and especially, the plastic strain of the present HE-BMG is improved from 0.8% for the Cu-free alloy to 4.7% for the 0.3 at.% Cu-added alloy. The transmission electron microscopy observation shows that there are many alpha-Fe (Co, Ni) clusters with sizes of less than 5 nm dispersed in the glassy matrix in the 0.3 and 0.6 at.% Cu-added alloys, which may account for the significant improvement in the plasticity of the two alloys, and further increase in Cu content more than 0.9 at.% leads to the precipitation of alpha-Fe (Co, Ni) and Fe (Co, Ni) B compound grains with diameters of tens of nanometers, in which the plasticity of the present HE-BMGs has deteriorated rapidly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据