4.8 Article

One-step synthesis of silver nanoparticles using carbon dots as reducing and stabilizing agents and their antibacterial mechanisms

期刊

CARBON
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 129-141

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.084

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [21225313]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21473125]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2014CFA003]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2042014kf0287]
  5. Large-scale Instrument and Equipment Sharing Foundation of Wuhan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are potent and broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. Herein, a novel one-step method has been used to synthesize AgNPs, in which fluorescent carbon dots (CDs) were used as reducing and stabilizing agents. To the best of our knowledge, the use of CDs as reducing and stabilizing agents has rarely been reported in conjunction with their use in the fabrication of AgNPs. Subsequently, their antibacterial activities were investigated. The results demonstrated that the surface property of AgNPs could influence the stability of AgNPs leading to different bactericidal effects. The size of the synthesized AgNPs was smaller when CDs were doped with sulfur. These small AgNPs exhibit better stability in culture medium contributing to excellent bactericidal activity, which can completely inhibit the growth of Escherichia coli (E. coli) at a concentration of 150 mu M of silver atom. Finally, the possible antibacterial mechanisms of AgNPs were proposed as follows: first, AgNPs can be absorbed easily onto the surface of E. coli and affect the permeability and fluidity of the outer membrane; second, AgNPs with smaller size (7.3 +/- 1.0 and 6.1 +/- 0.8 nm) can permeate the membrane of E. coli to interact with DNA and the respiratory chain; and third, the release of Ag+ can cause E. coli death. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据