4.6 Article

Current quality of life assessment tools may not fully address dermatological adverse events from anti-cancer therapies

期刊

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 9681-9685

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07424-5

关键词

Quality of life; Cancer; Oncodermatology; Dermatologic adverse event; Anti-cancer therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supportive oncodermatology is a growing field focused on addressing the unique dermatologic needs of cancer patients. However, dermatologic adverse events (dAEs) from anti-cancer therapies often go unrecognized and have a significant impact on patient well-being. Existing tools for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in this population are not specific enough and lack standardization. This article reviews the burden of dAEs and suggests strategies for improving HRQoL assessment in patients with dAEs from anti-cancer therapies.
Supportive oncodermatology is a burgeoning new field within dermatology tasked with caring for the unique dermatologic needs of patients with cancer. Patients with dermatologic adverse events (dAEs) from localized and systemic anti-cancer therapies commonly experience significant distress and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Emerging dAEs is often overlooked by clinicians and researchers, despite their considerable impacts on treatment completion and patient self-esteem. Specific HRQoL issues experienced by cancer patients with dAEs include psychosocial distress and treatment interruption or cessation. Existing HRQoL assessment indices unfortunately fall short when assessing HRQoL in patients with dAEs from anti-cancer therapies due to the lack of specificity to patients' symptoms and inability to fully encompass the unique needs of this population. Additionally, the variability in HRQoL assessments across studies is substantial, suggesting the need for a standardized HRQoL measure. Here, we review the burden of dAEs and the existing validated tools used to measure them, while outlining strategies for modification to achieve optimal HRQoL assessment in patients with dAEs from anti-cancer therapies and address the HRQoL gap in supportive oncodermatology. Amongst the current tools, Skindex-16 most closely addresses the required skin-specific HRQoL metrics, but still lacks a few key cancer-specific measures. Other general HRQoL tools are well-tailored to cancer patients, but lack skin-specific questions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Review Oncology

Prediction of breast cancer-related outcomes with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale: A literature review

Lauren Milton, Tara Behroozian, Natalie Coburn, Maureen Trudeau, Yasmeen Razvi, Erin McKenzie, Irene Karam, Henry Lam, Edward Chow

Summary: The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) is a validated tool used to measure patient symptoms in cancer patients. Studies reviewed show that ESAS can be used to predict patient survival time, emergency department visits, symptoms associated with decreased quality of life, and generate health utility scores.

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER (2021)

Review Oncology

Radiation dermatitis assessment tools used in breast cancer: A systematic review of measurement properties

Tara Behroozian, Lauren T. Milton, Neil H. Shear, Erin McKenzie, Yasmeen Razvi, Irene Karam, Kucy Pon, Henry Lam, Emily Lam, Edward Chow

Summary: This review assessed the quality and efficacy of tools used in scoring radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients and found that tools assessing clinician-reported outcomes had moderate correlation with biophysical parameter measurements, but low correlation with patient-reported outcomes. Most commonly used tools were found to be either insufficient or indeterminate in their measurement properties.

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER (2021)

Article Oncology

How do patient-reported outcomes compare with clinician assessments? A prospective study of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer

Tara Behroozian, Lauren Milton, Liying Zhang, Julia Lou, Irene Karam, Emily Lam, Gina Wong, Ewa Szumacher, Edward Chow

Summary: This study revealed significant discrepancies between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinician-reported outcomes (CROs) when assessing breast radiation dermatitis (RD). Clinicians significantly underreported all skin symptom assessment items compared to patients. The majority of patients used moisturizing creams as a prophylactic measure. The findings highlight the need for improved RD symptom assessment and support the development of a new tool with components from both patients and clinicians.

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Oncology

Symptom Burden Associated With Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy

Lauren Milton, Tara Behroozian, Nim Li, Liying Zhang, Julia Lou, Irene Karam, Matt Wronski, Erin McKenzie, Gord Mawdsley, Yasmeen Razvi, Edward Chow, Mark Ruschin

Summary: The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) is an effective tool for assessing fatigue, anxiety, and wellbeing in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT). However, it does not accurately reflect the severity of radiation dermatitis (RD) symptoms. Further research is needed to develop a new tool specifically designed to assess the burden of RD in RT for breast cancer.

CLINICAL BREAST CANCER (2022)

Review Oncology

Comparison of clinical practice guidelines on radiation dermatitis: a narrative review

Samuel Finkelstein, Lauren Kanee, Tara Behroozian, Julie Ryan Wolf, Corina van den Hurk, Edward Chow, Pierluigi Bonomo

Summary: Comparison of RD clinical practice guidelines published between 2010 and 2021 by different organizations revealed some agreement on treatment recommendations for acute RD and chronic RT-induced skin toxicities, such as the use of topical corticosteroids, silver sulfadiazine, washing, and deodorant. However, there is still minimal consensus on optimal dressing or barrier film for RD prophylaxis or management, indicating the need for further research to establish optimal treatments.

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER (2022)

Editorial Material Oncology

Update on the systematic review/meta-analysis of uncomplicated bone metastases treated with external beam radiation

Tara Behroozian, Inmaculada Navarro, Peter Hoskin, Candice Johnstone, Abram Recht, Johan Menten, Eva Oldenburger, Yvette van der Linden, Joanne M. van der Velden, Quynh-Nhu Nguyen, Charles B. Simone, Peter Johnstone, Stephen Lutz, Lauren Milton, Nicolaus Andratschke, Jonas Willmann, Joanna Kazmierska, Mateusz Spalek, Edward Chow, Srinivas Raman

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY (2022)

Article Oncology

Mepitel Film for the Prevention of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer: A Randomized Multicenter Open-Label Phase III Trial

Tara Behroozian, Lauren Milton, Irene Karam, Liying Zhang, Keyue Ding, Julia Lou, Francois Gallant, Eileen Rakovitch, William Tran, Hany Soliman, Eric Leung, Danny Vesprini, Ewa Szumacher, Hanbo Chen, Elysia Donovan, Jacqueline Lam, Silvana Spadafora, Matt Wronski, Chris Lavoie, Natalie Walde, Emily Lam, Gina Wong, Erin McKenzie, Krista Ariello, Samantha Kennedy, Saba Shariati, Katherine Carothers, Glen Gonzales, Yulya Kagan, Edward Chow

Summary: A confirmatory randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of Mepitel film (MF) in reducing radiation dermatitis (RD) in patients undergoing breast radiotherapy. The results showed that MF significantly reduced the incidence of grade 2 or 3 RD and had positive effects on patient-reported outcomes and clinician-reported outcomes.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2023)

暂无数据