4.7 Article

One-step construction of Ti-In bimetallic MOFs to improve synergistic effect of adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121658

关键词

Bimetallic MOFs; Synergistic effect; Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation; BPA

资金

  1. NSF of China [21878199, 21938006]
  2. National Key Technology RD Program [2020YFC1808401]
  3. Basic Research Project of Leading Technology in Jiangsu Province [BK20202012]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The key to efficient treatment of organic pollutants in water is to improve their mass transfer efficiency and reaction efficiency. In this study, a one-step construction of new metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) was achieved, which improved the adsorption performance and degradation rate by increasing the specific surface area.
The key to efficient treatment of organic pollutants in water is to improve their mass transfer efficiency and reaction efficiency. Herein, a one-step construction of new metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) using 4, 4', 4 '', 4 ''-(pyrene-1, 3, 6, 8-tetrayl) tetra-benzoic acid as a photosensitizer ligand and Ti-In as bimetallic centers has been constructed. The results exhibited that increased specific surface area was obtained by Ti-In-MOF(1:1), which improved the adsorption performance of 50 ppm bisphenol A to 38% and facilitated it complete degradation upon light irradiation in 20 min, being much faster than that of single In/Ti-MOFs. For Ti-In-MOF(1:1), the InMOF parts enhanced the adsorption capability, meanwhile the Ti-MOF parts based on infinite Ti-O chains realized the effective separation of photogenerated carriers. A synergistic role of adsorption and degradation achieved rapid mass transfer and excellent catalytic degradation performance. This investigation will provide a novel MOF construction strategy for efficient catalytic application in environmental pollutants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据