4.7 Article

Evidence of in-situ Cu clustering as a function of laser power during laser powder bed fusion of 17-4 PH stainless steel

期刊

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.114896

关键词

AtomProbeTomography; AdditiveManufacturing; StainlessSteels; Precipitation

资金

  1. AUSMURI program, Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of intrinsic heat treatments during additive manufacturing can eliminate the need for costly post-build processing. This study investigates the clustering and precipitation of copper in 17-4 PH stainless steel fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. The results show that the samples exhibit a higher degree of copper clustering and precipitation, and using a higher laser power leads to a higher density of copper clusters and precipitates. These findings demonstrate the potential for inducing desired strengthening phases directly during the fabrication process.
The use of intrinsic heat treatments to control the microstructural evolution during additive manufacturing could eliminate the need for costly post-build processing. Using atom probe microscopy and cluster search algorithms, this study investigates the degree of Cu clustering and precipitation in 17-4 precipitate hardening (PH) stainless steel fabricated by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). It was found that LPBF samples exhibit a greater than random degree of Cu clustering, irrespective of the laser power during fabrication. It is further shown that using a higher laser power (161.5 W rather than 127.5 W) led to a higher number density of Cu clusters, Cu precipitates, and higher hardness due to the greater heat input. The observations of Cu-rich clusters and precipitates within as-printed LPBF samples and its laser power dependence are novel and show potential for inducing desired strengthening phases directly during LPBF, mitigating the need for post-fabrication heat treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据