4.7 Article

Removal and recovery of phosphorus from secondary effluent using layered double hydroxide-biochar composites

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 844, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156802

关键词

Phosphorus; Adsorption; Recovery; Mineral-biochar composites; Phosphorus availability

资金

  1. Chongqing Talents Plan for Young Talents [CQY201905062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study synthesized LDH/BCs for the removal of phosphorus from wastewater and its application as fertilizers. The results showed that LDH/BCs effectively removed phosphorus and stimulated crop growth when used as fertilizers.
Removal of phosphorus (P) from wastewater and its recovery as a fertilizer are solutions to both P pollution control and resource recycling for agriculture. In this study, various layered double hydroxide biochar composites (LDH/BCs), namely, Zn-Al-LDH/BC, Mg-Al-LDH/BC, and Mg-Fe-LDH/BC, were synthesized to remove P from secondary effluents and then applied as fertilizers. Batch experiments showed that LDH/BCs could adsorb Pin fast kinetics, with adsorption capacities ranging 35.19-55.76 mg P/g. A dynamic experiment was performed under different column heights and flow rates, and the results fitted well with Thomas model (R-2 > 0.90). These LDH/BCs effectively removed Pin the continuous mode, even when treating secondary effluents. Furthermore, when the used LDH/BCs applied as fertilizers, the adsorbed Mg-Al-LDH/BC and Mg-Fe-LDH/BC stimulated crop growth; however, Zn-Al-LDH/BC did not. These differences were attributed to not only the availability of P, but also the stimulation or inhibition of photosynthetic pigment synthesis in crops by adsorbents. Overall, we synthesized LDH/BCs, which effectively removed and recovered P from secondary effluents, and investigated the factors influencing the effects of LDH/BCs on crops. We suggest that both P availability and physiological influences of adsorbents on crops should be considered when using adsorbents as fertilizers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据