4.8 Article

The synergistic mechanism of thermally reduced graphene oxide and antioxidant in improving the thermo-oxidative stability of polypropylene

期刊

CARBON
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 340-349

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.069

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51133005, 51373109, 51421061]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013SCU04A02]
  3. Sichuan Youth Science and Technology Foundation [2015JQ0012]
  4. Innovation Team Program of Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2013TD0013]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering of China [skIpme2014-3-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility of using thermally reduced graphene oxide (TrGO) to improve the antioxidative efficiency of commercial antioxidant (3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, AO) on unstabilized polypropylene (PP) was evaluated in terms of the oxidation induction time (OIT) and the initial degradation temperature (T-i). It was found that a synergistic effect exist between AO and TrGO in retarding the degradation of PP in oxygen-containing atmosphere. Compared with that of PP/AO (100/0.5) sample, the OIT value of PP/AO/TrGO (100/0.5/1) composite was almost doubled at 180 degrees C and the value of T-i in air was improved by 37.2 degrees C. As verified by using radical scavenging assay with the 1,1-dipheny1-2-picrylhydrazyl radical, the TrGO sheets exhibited a good radical scavenging capacity. The synergistic stabilization mechanism was attributed to the enhanced dispersion of TrGO sheets in the PP matrix in the presence of 0.5 wt.% AO, which could improve the oxygen barrier effect and radical scavenging efficiency of TrGO. This synergistic effect between AO and TrGO can efficiently reduce the concentrations of oxygen and peroxy radicals in the PP matrix, leading to the significant improvement in thermo-oxidative stability of PP/AO/TrG composite. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据