4.6 Article

Atmospheric phosphorus deposition amplifies carbon sinks in simulations of a tropical forest in Central Africa

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 237, 期 6, 页码 2054-2068

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.18535

关键词

Africa; atmospheric deposition; carbon cycle; carbon sink; land surface modelling; nutrient limitation; phosphorus; tropical forest

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used a terrestrial biosphere model to investigate the impact of changes in atmospheric nitrogen and phosphorus deposition on plant nutrition and biomass carbon sink in Central African forests. The findings suggest that the increase in nutrient deposition since the 1980s has contributed to the carbon sink over the past four decades, with phosphorus deposition playing a significant role.
Spatial redistribution of nutrients by atmospheric transport and deposition could theoretically act as a continental-scale mechanism which counteracts declines in soil fertility caused by nutrient lock-up in accumulating biomass in tropical forests in Central Africa. However, to what extent it affects carbon sinks in forests remains elusive. Here we use a terrestrial biosphere model to quantify the impact of changes in atmospheric nitrogen and phosphorus deposition on plant nutrition and biomass carbon sink at a typical lowland forest site in Central Africa. We find that the increase in nutrient deposition since the 1980s could have contributed to the carbon sink over the past four decades up to an extent which is similar to that from the combined effects of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide and climate change. Furthermore, we find that the modelled carbon sink responds to changes in phosphorus deposition, but less so to nitrogen deposition. The pronounced response of ecosystem productivity to changes in nutrient deposition illustrates a potential mechanism that could control carbon sinks in Central Africa. Monitoring the quantity and quality of nutrient deposition is needed in this region, given the changes in nutrient deposition due to human land use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据