4.6 Article

A step toward considering the return period in flood spatial modeling

期刊

NATURAL HAZARDS
卷 115, 期 1, 页码 431-460

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05561-y

关键词

Flood; Machine learning; Radar; Remote sensing; Return period; Embedded feature selection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, spatial modeling and flood hazard prediction have gained increasing interest. This study used machine learning models to perform spatial modeling, considering flood hazard zones in different return periods. The results showed that elevation, distance from stream, precipitation, slope, and land use are important factors in flood hazard prediction.
In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in spatial modeling, and flood hazard prediction is a major area of interest within the field of hydrology. It is necessary to consider return periods for identifying the flood hazard zones. In hydraulic modeling such as HEC-RAS, this is usually done, but in spatial modeling by machine learning (ML) models, this has not been taken into account so far. This study seeks to obtain data that will help to address this research gap. The Sentinel-1 Radar images have been used for identifying the flooded locations in different return periods. An embedded feature selection algorithm (i.e., recursive feature elimination random forest; RFE-RF) was used in the current research for key feature selection. Then, three ML models of neural networks using model averaging, classification and regression tree, and support vector machine were employed. The flood hazard prediction demonstrated a great performance for all the applied models (i.e., accuracy and precision > 90%, Kappa > 88%). Sensitivity analysis disclosed that the variables of elevation and distance from stream are in the first importance order, the variables of precipitation, slope, and land use are in the second importance order, and other variables are in the third importance order in all return periods. The modeling results indicated that among man-made land uses the irrigated area between 17.7 and 31.4%, dry farming from 0.5 to 2.4%, and residential areas between 8.3 and 25.1% are exposed to high and very high flood hazard areas. The current findings add to a growing body of literature on the spatial modeling of floods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据