4.6 Article

Optimization of the Laminate Structure of a Composite Cylinder Based on the Combination of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27217361

关键词

RSM; FEA; composite cylinder; optimization design

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2232020G-12]
  2. Visiting Scholar Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Fiber Material Modification [KF2203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study optimized the laminate structure of a composite cylinder under the constraint of minimum layup thickness. The accuracy of the optimization design was verified through progressive damage theory and finite element analysis. Orthogonal experiments and response surface methodology were used to establish the optimization model, and the optimal scheme was verified using finite element analysis.
This study optimized the laminate structure of a composite cylinder under the constraint of minimum layup thickness. Based on the progressive damage theory, a finite element model of the cylinder was established, and the NOL ring tensile test was used to verify the accuracy of the damage theory. The winding angle, the number of layers, and the helical/hoop ratio (the stacking sequence) were selected as the optimization factors, and the burst pressure value was used to evaluate the quality of the laminate structure. Then the orthogonal experiments were designed by RSM. Combined with FEA, the function model of the burst pressure of the gas cylinder and each optimization factor was established to obtain the optimal layering scheme, satisfying the minimum burst pressure. In addition, finite element analysis was used to verify the optimal scheme, demonstrating that the error of the burst pressure predicted by the quadratic model established by the response surface design was not more than 5%. This study provides a faster and more efficient optimization method for the optimization design of composite gas cylinder layers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据