Shared decision-making following disclosure of coronary heart disease genetic risk: results from a randomized clinical trial
出版年份 2016 全文链接
标题
Shared decision-making following disclosure of coronary heart disease genetic risk: results from a randomized clinical trial
作者
关键词
-
出版物
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 681-688
出版商
BMJ
发表日期
2016-12-25
DOI
10.1136/jim-2016-000318
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Incorporating a Genetic Risk Score Into Coronary Heart Disease Risk EstimatesCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
- (2016) Iftikhar J. Kullo et al. CIRCULATION
- Design of a randomized controlled trial of disclosing genomic risk of coronary heart disease: the Myocardial Infarction Genes (MI-GENES) study
- (2015) Iftikhar J. Kullo et al. BMC Medical Genomics
- Shared Decision Making
- (2014) Henry H. Ting et al.
- Impact of Sociodemographic Patient Characteristics on the Efficacy of Decision Aids
- (2014) Megan Coylewright et al.
- Primary-care providers’ perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature
- (2014) Natalie A. Mikat-Stevens et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Peering into the black box: a meta-analysis of how clinicians use decision aids during clinical encounters
- (2014) Kirk D Wyatt et al. Implementation Science
- Shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial in primary care
- (2013) Megan E Branda et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk
- (2013) David C. Goff et al. CIRCULATION
- Clinical genomics in the world of the electronic health record
- (2013) Keith Marsolo et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present and future
- (2013) Omri Gottesman et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- The Mayo Clinic Biobank: A Building Block for Individualized Medicine
- (2013) Janet E. Olson et al. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
- Using a ‘talk’ model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION5 Item
- (2013) Glyn Elwyn et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Shared Decision Making
- (2012) Erica S. Spatz et al.
- Leveraging the electronic health record to implement genomic medicine
- (2012) Iftikhar J. Kullo et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Patients’ understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results
- (2012) Kimberly A. Kaphingst et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Development and Evaluation of CAHPS Questions to Assess the Impact of Health Information Technology on Patient Experiences With Ambulatory Care
- (2012) D. Keith McInnes et al. MEDICAL CARE
- Large-scale association analysis identifies new risk loci for coronary artery disease
- (2012) Panos Deloukas et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Complement Receptor 1 Gene Variants Are Associated with Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate
- (2011) Iftikhar J. Kullo et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Genotype-informed estimation of risk of coronary heart disease based on genome-wide association data linked to the electronic medical record
- (2011) Keyue Ding et al. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
- Personalized genomic information: preparing for the future of genetic medicine
- (2010) Alan E. Guttmacher et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- A Genome-Wide Association Study of Red Blood Cell Traits Using the Electronic Medical Record
- (2010) Iftikhar J. Kullo et al. PLoS One
- The Statin Choice decision aid in primary care: A randomized trial
- (2009) Devin M. Mann et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Putting science over supposition in the arena of personalized genomics
- (2008) Colleen M McBride et al. NATURE GENETICS
- Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges
- (2008) Mark I. McCarthy et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started