4.0 Article

Stromal Vascular Fraction Reverses the Age-Related Impairment in Revascularization following Injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 343-357

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000526002

关键词

Aging; Cell therapy; Angiogenesis; Revascularization; Injury; T cells

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30ES030283, R01AG053585, R01AG049821]
  2. Gheen's Foundation (AJL)
  3. University of Florida's Division of Research Program Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of age on adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and finds that aging reduces SVF's ability to promote blood vessel formation. It also demonstrates how an ex vivo model can be used to study the contribution of SVF therapy to angiogenesis.
Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) has emerged as a potential regenerative therapy, but few studies utilize SVF in a setting of advanced age. Additionally, the specific cell population in SVF providing therapeutic benefit is unknown. We hypothesized that aging would alter the composition of cell populations present in SVF and its ability to promote angiogenesis following injury, a mechanism that is T cell-mediated. SVF isolated from young and old Fischer 344 rats was examined with flow cytometry for cell composition. Mesenteric windows from old rats were isolated following exteriorization-induced (EI) hypoxic injury and intravenous injection of one of four cell therapies: (1) SVF from young or (2) old donors, (3) SVF from old donors depleted of or (4) enriched for T cells. Advancing age increased the SVF T-cell population but reduced revascularization following injury. Both young and aged SVF incorporated throughout the host mesenteric microvessels, but only young SVF significantly increased vascular area following EI. This study highlights the effect of donor age on SVF angiogenic efficacy and demonstrates how the ex vivo mesenteric-window model can be used in conjunction with SVF therapy to investigate its contribution to angiogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据