4.5 Article

Optimizing thermal stability and mechanical behavior in segregation-engineered nanocrystalline Al-Ni-Ce alloys: A combinatorial study

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 18, 页码 3083-3098

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1557/s43578-022-00715-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Advanced Manufacturing Office [DE-EE0009114]
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [1650114]
  3. MRSEC Program of the NSF [DMR 1720256]
  4. NSF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the evolution of microstructure and mechanical properties of segregation-engineered nanocrystalline alloys, identifying alloys and processing conditions that exhibit exceptional thermal stability, strength retention, and homogeneous plastic flow. Thermal stability and deformation mechanism maps are constructed to demarcate important regimes of behavior.
The deliberate use of solute enrichment at grain boundaries, otherwise known as segregation engineering, is a promising approach to tailor the properties of interface-dominated materials such as nanocrystalline alloys. The ensuing chemical and structural evolution at grain boundaries can give rise to thermal stability and excellent mechanical properties, but the interplay between enrichment, phase decomposition, grain growth, and mechanical behavior exists in a vast composition and processing space. In this study, a combinatorial synthesis and rapid characterization approach was applied to segregation-engineered nanocrystalline Al-Ni-Ce alloys to assess the evolution of microstructure and resulting mechanical behavior as functions of alloying content and annealing conditions. In addition to the identification of alloys and processing conditions that give rise to exceptional thermal stability, strength retention, and homogeneous plastic flow, we construct combined thermal stability and deformation mechanism maps that demarcate several important regimes of behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据