4.7 Article

Mucosal-associated invariant T cells from patients with tuberculosis exhibit impaired immune response

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
卷 72, 期 3, 页码 338-352

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.11.010

关键词

Tuberculosis; Immune response; MAIT cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81201258, 81273225, 81571961]
  2. National Science & Technology Major Project for Infectious Diseases [2013ZX10003006-003-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To identify factors which regulate MAIT cell response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens, and to investigate the role of MAIT cells in patients with active tuberculosis. Methods: Immune response of MAIT cells to M. tuberculosis antigens were compared between patients with active TB and healthy controls by flow cytometry and RNA sequencing. Results: IFN-gamma response of MAIT cells to M. tuberculosis lysates was dramatically improved by signal 3 cytokine IL-15 (p = 0.0002). Patients with active TB exhibited highly reduced IFN-gamma production in MAIT cells stimulated with M. tuberculosis lysates/IL-15 compared with healthy controls (p < 0.0001) and individuals with latent TB infection (p = 0.0008). RNA sequencing of flow-sorted MAIT cells from patients with TB and healthy controls identified numerous differentially expressed genes, and the expression of genes that encode IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-17F, granulysin and granzyme B were all down-regulated in patients with TB. MAIT cells from patients with TB has significantly lower expression of gamma c receptor than those from healthy controls under condition of Mtb lysates/IL-15 stimulation (p = 0.0028). Blockade of both gc and IL-2R beta receptors resulted in highly reduced frequency of IFN-gamma-producing MAIT cells (79.4%) (p = 0.0011). Conclusions: MAIT cells from patients with active TB exhibited impaired cytokine and cytotoxic response to M. tuberculosis antigens. (C) 2016 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据