4.7 Article

Time-dependent mathematical modeling of binary gas mixture in facilitated transport membranes (FTMs): A real condition for single-reaction mechanism

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.05.004

关键词

Mixed gas separation; Facilitated transport membrane; Instantaneous reaction; Numerical modeling; Non liner reaction diffusion equation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a comprehensive time-dependent mathematical model for gas separation through the facilitated transport membranes (FTMs) is presented. The model results have been validated with independent CO2/N-2 binary gas mixture experiments in DEA-impregnated PVA membranes. In the proposed model, non-equal diffusion coefficients of the carrier/complex and equilibrium constant for the chemical reaction kinetics between the carrier/permeant in the FTM have been considered. In addition, a method to compute the diffusion coefficients, which depend on the concentration of each component in the FTM, is presented. Moreover, effect of carrier concentration, feed partial pressure, kinetics of reversible chemical reactions and membrane performances depending on operating condition have been analyzed. Owing to accurate calculation of physical-chemical parameter involved, this model is much more executive comparing to previous works. In addition, the real condition of the reaction kinetics and influencing of diffusion parameters of the components in FTMs, have been investigated. The predicted selectivity and permeability revealed good conformity with experimental data; with standard deviation (SD) 8.57% and 12.87%, respectively. In conclusion, this model with significant validity would be predictive in cases for the entire range of diffusion-limit to a chemical-limit regime where the experimental data, geometry condition, physical-chemical property of parameters is not available. (C) 2016 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据