4.7 Article

Encapsulation of honokiol into self-assembled pectin nanoparticles for drug delivery to HepG2 cells

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 31-38

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.102

关键词

Honokiol; Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin; Pectin; Nanoparticle; HepG2

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC [cstc2012jjA10021]
  2. National Research Foundation for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20125503120003]
  3. Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [KJ120307]
  4. Chongqing Board of Health Project [2013-2-060]
  5. Students' Research and Innovation Experimental Project of Chongqing Medical University [201244, 201229, 201217, 201432]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-assembled pectin nanoparticles was prepared and evaluated for delivering the hydrophobic drug, honokiol (HK), to HepG2 cells. These hydrophobic drug-loaded nanoparticles were developed without using any surfactant and organic solvent. Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin (HCD) was used to fabricate an inclusion complex with HK (HKHCD) to increase the solubility of the drug and thus facilitate its encapsulation and dispersion in the pectin nanoparticles. Investigation of the in vitro release indicated that the drug-loaded nanoparticles exhibited a higher drug release rate than free honokiol and an effective sustained-release. Cytotoxicity, cell apoptosis and cellular uptake studies further confirmed that the pectin nanoparticles with galactose residues generated higher cytotoxicity than free honokiol on HepG2 cells which highly expressed asialoglycoprotein receptors (ASGR). Nevertheless, these findings were not observed in ASGR-negative A549 cells under similar condition. Therefore, pectin nanoparticles demonstrated a specific active targeting ability to ASGR-positive HepG2 cells and could be used as a potential drug carrier for treatment of liver-related tumors.(C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据