4.7 Article

Interaction analysis and multi-response optimization of transformer winding design parameters

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106233

关键词

Transformer winding; Interaction; Multi -response optimization; Response surface methodology; Desirability function approach

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52076166]
  2. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment, Xi'an Jiaotong University [EIPE20206]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a multi-response optimization on the design parameter of a transformer winding using the response surface methodology and desirability function approach, and identified a design with better combined thermal-hydraulic performance.
This work conducted a multi-response optimization on the design parameter of a transformer winding based on the response surface methodology and desirability function approach to find a design with better combined -thermal-hydraulic performance. A numerical experiment was performed with two-dimensional axisymmetric numerical heat transfer models. Response surface models were established based on experimental results and checked through analyses of variance. Regression equations were fitted and then verified. Interactions among factors were investigated in detail. A multi-response optimization was carried out on the winding design pa-rameters and optimum design was identified using the desirability function approach. The results showed that the response surface models built up in this work were all significant and all the responses could be predicted accurately based on the regression equations. The design with the block washer number of 1, axial duct size of 8 mm and radial duct size of 3 mm was found as the optimum winding design of this work. Compared with the conventional design, the optimum design increased the Colburn-j factor and Darcy friction factor by 212% and 9%, respectively, simultaneously decreased the maximum and mean temperature rises by 67.1% and 70.5%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据