4.7 Article

An Unsupervised Bayesian Neural Network for Truth Discovery in Social Networks

期刊

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2021.3054853

关键词

Reliability; Bayes methods; Social networking (online); Neural networks; Hidden Markov models; Unsupervised learning; Probability distribution; Truth discovery; unsupervised learning; autoencoder; Bayesian network; social network

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 grant [MOE2018-T2-2-019]
  2. A*STAR under its RIE2020 Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering (AME) Industry Alignment Fund - Pre Positioning (IAF-PP) [A19D6a0053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the problem of estimating event truths from conflicting agent opinions in a social network. An autoencoder learns the complex relationships between event truths, agent reliabilities, and agent observations, guided by a Bayesian network model. The proposed approach is unsupervised and applicable in the absence of ground truth labels. Experimental results demonstrate its competitiveness and superiority over several benchmark methods.
The problem of estimating event truths from conflicting agent opinions in a social network is investigated. An autoencoder learns the complex relationships between event truths, agent reliabilities and agent observations. A Bayesian network model is proposed to guide the learning process by modeling the relationship of the autoencoder's outputs with different variables. At the same time, it also models the social relationships between agents in the network. The proposed approach is unsupervised and is applicable when ground truth labels of events are unavailable. A variational inference method is used to jointly estimate the hidden variables in the Bayesian network and the parameters in the autoencoder. Experiments on three real datasets demonstrate that our proposed approach is competitive with, and in most cases better than, several state-of-the-art benchmark methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据