4.7 Article

State Estimation and Motion Prediction of Vehicles and Vulnerable Road Users for Cooperative Autonomous Driving: A Survey

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3160932

关键词

Autonomous vehicles; Cameras; Roads; Meteorology; Vehicle dynamics; Navigation; Standards; Cooperative autonomous driving; motion prediction; perception; state estimation; vulnerable road users

资金

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech
  2. Safe-D Project (Safety through Disruption and Safe-D National UTC) [69A3551747115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a comprehensive survey of motion prediction and state estimation literature, which is essential for path planning and navigation functionalities of autonomous vehicles. The study summarizes significant progress made in complex traffic environments and highlights the research challenges that need to be overcome.
The recent progress in autonomous vehicle research and development has led to increasingly widespread testing of fully autonomous vehicles on public roads, where complex traffic scenarios arise. Along with these vehicles, partially autonomous vehicles, manually-driven vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, and some animals can be present on the road, to which autonomous vehicles must react. This study focuses on a comprehensive survey of the literature on motion prediction and state estimation of vehicles and VRUs, which are essential for path planning and navigation functionalities of an autonomous vehicle. Motion prediction and state estimation methods utilize the vehicle's own sensory perception capabilities and information obtained through cooperative perception from V2V and V2X connections. This survey summarizes the significant progress that has been made in both categories, discusses the most promising results to date and outlines critical research challenges that need to be overcome to achieve full autonomy, from an ego vehicle's perspective in mixed traffic environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据