4.5 Article

The relationship between the weight-adjusted-waist index and left ventricular hypertrophy in Chinese hypertension adults

期刊

HYPERTENSION RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 253-260

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41440-022-01075-z

关键词

Weight-adjusted-waist index; Left ventricular hypertrophy; Hypertension adults

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a positive correlation between weight-adjusted-waist index (WWI) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in Chinese hypertension adults.
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a major cardiac complication of hypertension. Weight-adjusted-waist index (WWI) is a new obesity index that has been found to be positively associated with cardiovascular disease mortality. We aimed to investigate the relationship between the WWI and LVH in Chinese hypertension adults. The study is a community-based cross-sectional study that included 4715 patients with hypertension and integrated clinical and echocardiographic data. LVH was diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography in these patients based on a criterion of left ventricular mass index (LVMI) over 49.2 g/m(2.7) in men and 46.7 g/m(2.7) in women. The independent association between the WWI quartiles and LVH prevalence was analyzed by logistic regression models. The prevalence of LVH in the first quartile of WWI (Q1: <10.16), second (Q2: 10.16 similar to 10.67), the third (Q3: 10.68 similar to 11.19), and the highest quartile (Q4: >= 11.20) was 34.1%, 38.4%, 42.4%, 51.5%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis suggested that the WWI was independently correlated with LVH with adjustment of confounding factors, and increased across the quartile of WWI. Compared to the first quartile of WWI (Q1), the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for LVH in the increasing quartiles (Q2-Q4) were 1.33(1.08-1.63), 1.50 (1.19-1.89) and 2.28(1.74-2.99), respectively. In stratified analyses, the relationship between WWI and LVH risk persisted. The WWI may be an independent determinant of LVH in Chinese hypertension adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据