4.7 Article

Porphyrin coordination polymer supported transition-metal sulfides as precious-metal-free electrocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting

期刊

DYES AND PIGMENTS
卷 206, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2022.110620

关键词

Porphyrin coordination polymer; Acidic oxygen evolution; Overall water splitting; DFT calculation; Synergetic effect

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Foundation [2016M601733, 2018T110446]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22075110, 21171076]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150488]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents the development of porphyrin coordination polymer supported transition-metal sulfides as bifunctional electrocatalysts with excellent performance in strongly acidic medium. The efficient electrochemical water splitting is attributed to the synergetic effect and unique structure characteristics of the catalyst.
The electrochemical water splitting in strongly acidic medium with noble-metal-free electrocatalysts remains a desirable yet technological challenge. Herein, we developed a series of porphyrin coordination polymer supported transition-metal sulfides as bifunctional electrocatalysts (Co3S4@MoS2@nTiPCP, n = 10, 20 or 30) that performs well in acidic media. The optimal Co3S4@MoS2@20TiPCP achieves current densities of 10 mA cm(-2) at overpotentials of 247 and 110 mV for acidic OER and HER, respectively. Particularly, an electrolyzer with better long-term stability using Co3S4@MoS2@20TiPCP as both cathode and anode exhibits a low cell voltage of 1.41 V at 10 mA cm(-2) in acid, outperforming most other reported electrocatalysts elsewhere. The efficient electrochemical water splitting is ascribed to the synergetic effect and the unique structure characteristics. DFT calculations demonstrate that the Co atoms in Co3S4@MoS2@20TiPCP are the major active sites for electrochemical water splitting thanks to regulated electronic structures and reduced reaction energy barrier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据