4.8 Review

It's Totally Tubular....Riding The New Wave of Ovarian Cancer Research

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 76, 期 1, 页码 10-17

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1382

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Israeli Science Foundation
  2. European Commission FP7-PEOPLE-CIG grant
  3. Women's health grant at Rambam
  4. Israeli Cancer Association
  5. Israel Cancer Research Fund
  6. National Cancer Institute at the NIH [P50-CA083636]
  7. NIH [U01 CA-152990, R21 CA-156021]
  8. Honorable Tina Brozman 'Tina's Wish' Foundation
  9. Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  10. Robert and Debra First Fund
  11. Gamel Family Fund
  12. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome carries significant mortality for young women if effective preventive and screening measures are not taken. Preventive salpingo-oophorectomy is currently the only method known to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer-related death. Histopathological analyses of these surgical specimens indicate that a high proportion of ovarian cancers in women at high risk and in the general population arise from the fallopian tube. This paradigm shift concerning the cell of origin for the most common subtype of ovarian cancer, highgrade serous carcinoma, has sparked a major effort within the research community to develop new and robust model systems to study the fallopian tube epithelium as the cell of origin of ovarian cancer. In this review, evidence supporting the fallopian tube as the origin of ovarian cancer is presented as are novel experimental model systems for studying the fallopian tube epithelium in high-risk women as well as in the general population. This review also addresses the clinical implications of the newly proposed cell of origin, the clinical questions that arise, and novel strategies for ovarian cancer prevention. (C)2015 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据