4.3 Article

Chromosomal Mapping of Transposable Elements of the Rex Family in the Bristlenose Catfish, Ancistrus (Siluriformes, Loricariidae), from the Amazonian Region

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEREDITY
卷 108, 期 3, 页码 254-261

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esw084

关键词

chromosomal evolution; fish; Loricariidae; repetitive DNA; retrotransposons

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia/PPG Genetica, Conservacao e Biologia Evolutiva (INPA/GCBEv)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisas do Estado do Amazonas (PRONEX FAPEAM/CNPq)
  4. Center for Studies of Adaptation to Environmental Changes in the Amazon (INCT ADAPTA) [FAPEAM/CNPq 573976/2008-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Repetitive DNA sequences are present in the genome of basically every known organism, and transposable elements (TE) are one of the most representative sequences involved in chromosomal rearrangements and the genomic evolution of eukaryotes. In fish, the non-LTR retrotransposon TEs, Rex1, Rex3, and Rex6, are widely distributed in fish genomes and are the best-characterized TEs in several species. In the current study, three of these retroelements were physically mapped, through fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), in 7 species (71 specimens) of the genus Ancistrus, known as bristlenose catfish: Ancistrus ranunculus, Ancistrus sp. 1 Purus, Ancistrus sp. 2 Catalao, Ancistrus dolichopterus, Ancistrus maximus, Ancistrus aff. dolichopterus, and Ancistrus dubius. Rex1, Rex3, and Rex6 showed a cluster distribution, mainly in the terminal and pericentromeric portions, in heterochromatic and euchromatic regions, and did not occur in sexual chromosomes; however, the number and position of the clusters varied between species. This TE distribution suggests its implication in the karyotypic evolution of these species, without affecting the rise of sexual chromosome systems in Ancistrus, in view of their chromosomal variation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据