4.6 Article

Preferential precipitation of acidic variants from monoclonal antibody pools

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
卷 120, 期 1, 页码 114-124

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.28257

关键词

charge variants; monoclonal antibodies; polyethylene glycol; precipitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a preferential precipitation process to reduce the content of acidic variants in monoclonal antibody (mAb) downstream pools. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was found to facilitate the precipitation of acidic mAb variants. By using a multistage precipitation and recycling approach, the yield was improved, leading to potential benefits in throughput and manufacturing costs.
Microheterogeneity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can impact their activity and stability. Formation of charge variants is considered as the most important source of the microheterogeneity. In particular, controlling the content of the acidic species is often of major importance for the production process and regulatory approval of therapeutic proteins. In this study, the preferential precipitation process was developed for reducing the content of acidic variants in mAb downstream pools. The process design was preceded by the determination of phase behavior of mAb variants in the presence of different precipitants. It was shown that the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG) in protein solutions favored precipitation of acidic variants of mAbs. Precipitation yield was influenced by the variant composition in the mAb feed solutions, the concentration of the precipitant and the protein, and the ionic strength of the solutions. To improve yield, multistage precipitation was employed, where the precipitate was recycled to the precipitation process. The final product was a mixture of supernatants pooled together from the recycling steps. Such an approach can be potentially used either instead or in a combination with chromatography for adjusting the acidic variant content of mAbs, which can benefit in improvement in throughput and reduction in manufacturing costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据