4.7 Editorial Material

Sarcopenia definition, diagnosis and treatment: consensus is growing

期刊

AGE AND AGEING
卷 51, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac220

关键词

sarcopenia; older people; muscle function; muscle strength; skeletal muscle mass

资金

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre based at the Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University
  2. Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sarcopenia is a skeletal muscle disorder that commonly occurs with advancing age and long-term conditions. It is associated with adverse health effects and its recognition in clinical practice is relatively recent. Progress in the future may include the use of routine health data, prescription of resistance exercise, and the translation of biology and epidemiology into new treatment research.
Sarcopenia is a skeletal muscle disorder that commonly occurs with advancing age as well as with a number of long-term conditions. Recognition in clinical practice is relatively recent but important because of the association between sarcopenia and a range of adverse effects on health including impaired mobility, increased morbidity and mortality. Originally characterised as loss of muscle mass, the definition has evolved to focus on loss of skeletal muscle function, particularly strength, through a number of international definitions such as that of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People most recently revised in 2019. Progress in the decades ahead is likely to be seen with regard to use of routine health data, prescription of resistance exercise, translation of biology and epidemiology into first in man studies for new treatments, and focus on sarcopenia in low and middle-income countries. Immediate next steps include the newly formed Global Leadership Initiative on Sarcopenia to develop international consensus on definition and diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据