4.5 Article

High-order lubrication theory in channels and tubes with variable geometry

期刊

ACTA MECHANICA
卷 233, 期 10, 页码 4063-4081

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00707-022-03313-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lubrication theory is extended to study the laminar flow of an incompressible and highly viscous simple Newtonian fluid in microfluidic channels and tubes with variable geometry. The analysis includes different shapes for the walls and axisymmetric tubes with variable circular cross section, and derives analytical expressions for the average pressure drop.
Lubrication theory is used widely due to its simplicity and accuracy in many circumstances such as for the modeling of thin fluid films, the motion of particles near surfaces, and the flow in narrow geometries and configurations. Here, we present an extension to the classical lubrication theory to study the laminar flow of an incompressible and highly viscous simple Newtonian fluid in microfluidic channels and tubes with variable geometry using a formal perturbation expansion in terms of the aspect ratio. The analysis generalizes and extends the work of Tavakol et al., Proc. R. Soc. A, 473 (2017) by considering (a) different shapes for the upper and lower walls of the channel, and (b) axisymmetric tubes with variable circular cross section. Analytical expressions in series form for the average pressure drop, required to maintain the constant flowrate through the channel or tube, are derived, where the formulas are provided in terms of the function(s) that describe the shape of the wall(s). Furthermore, the formulas are processed with techniques that increase the accuracy and extend the domain of convergence of series. For symmetric and periodic undulating channels and tubes, the comparison of the analytical results derived here with numerical results from the literature reveals the great accuracy and efficiency of the high-order lubrication theory, as well as its superiority against the well-known domain perturbation method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据