4.4 Article

Subglacial processes on an Antarctic ice stream bed. 1: Sediment transport and bedform genesis inferred from marine geophysical data

期刊

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
卷 62, 期 232, 页码 270-284

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2016.18

关键词

glacial lineations; grounding-zone wedges; ice stream; mega-scale; subglacial bedforms; till

资金

  1. Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC) UK [NE/G015430/1, NE/G018677/1]
  2. NERC [NE/J018333/1, NEJJ004766/1]
  3. NERC [NE/G018677/1, NE/J004766/1, NE/G015430/1, bas0100030] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G015430/1, NE/G018677/1, NE/J018333/1, NE/J004766/1, bas0100030] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spatial pattern and morphometry of bedforms and their relationship to sediment thickness have been analysed in the Marguerite Bay Palaeo-ice stream Trough, western Antarctic Peninsula. Over 17 000 glacial landforms were measured from geophysical datasets, and sediment thickness maps were generated from acoustic sub-bottom profiler data. These analyses reveal a complex bedform pattern characterised by considerable spatial diversity, influenced heavily by the underlying substrate. The variability in length and density of mega-scale lineations indicates an evolving bedform signature, whereby landforms are preserved at different stages of maturity. Lineation generation and attenuation is associated with regions of thick, soft till where deformation was likely to be the greatest. The distribution of soft till and the localised extent of grounding-zone wedges (GZWs) indicate a dynamic sedimentary system characterised by considerable spatio-temporal variability in sediment erosion, transport and deposition. Formation of GZWs on the outer shelf of Marguerite Trough, within the error range of the radiocarbon dates, requires large sediment fluxes (upwards of 1000 m(3) a(-1) (m grounding line width)(-1)), and a >1 m thick mobile till layer, or rapid basal sliding velocities (upwards of 6 km a(-1)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据