4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Fish composition and species richness in eastern South American coastal lagoons: additional support for the freshwater ecoregions of the world

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
卷 89, 期 1, 页码 280-314

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13011

关键词

connectivity; FEOW; neotropics; salinity tolerance; species-area relationship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationships between fish composition, connectivity and morphometry of 103 lagoons in nine freshwater ecoregions (FEOW) between 2.83 degrees S and 37.64 degrees Swere evaluated in order to detect possible congruence between the gradient of species richness and similarities of assemblage composition. Most lagoons included in the study were <2km(2), with a maximum of 3975 km(2) in surface area. Combined surface area of all lagoons included in the study was 5411 km(2). Number of species varied locally from one to 76. A multiple regression revealed that latitude, attributes of morphometry and connectivity, and sampling effort explained a large amount of variability in species richness. Lagoon area was a good predictor of species richness except in low latitude ecoregions, where lagoons are typically small-sized and not affected by marine immigrants, and where non-native fish species accounted for a significant portion of species richness. Relationships between species and area in small-sized lagoons (<2km(2)) is highly similar to the expected number in each ecoregion, with systems located between 18.27 degrees S and 30.15 degrees S attaining higher levels of species richness. Similarities in species composition within the primary, secondary and peripheral or marine divisions revealed strong continental biogeographic patterns only for species less tolerant or intolerant to salinity. Further support for the FEOW scheme in the eastern border of South America is therefore provided, and now includes ecotonal systems inhabited simultaneously by freshwater and marine species of fishes. (C) 2016 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据