4.7 Article

Dampened antiviral immunity to intravaginal exposure to RNA viral pathogens allows enhanced viral replication

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 213, 期 13, 页码 2913-2929

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20161289

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [DP2 AI112244]
  2. University of California Hellman Award
  3. Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) Pilot Award [P30 AI027763, CNIHR P30 AI027767]
  4. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine/Gladstone Institutes Fellowship [TG2-01160]
  5. CFAR Mentored Scientist Award [P30 AI027763]
  6. NIH [P30 AI027763, R01 AI097552]
  7. National Center for Research Resources grant [RR18928]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the host immune response to vaginal exposure to RNA viruses is required to combat sexual transmission of this class of pathogens. In this study, using lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) and Zika virus (ZIKV) in wild-type mice, we show that these viruses replicate in the vaginal mucosa with minimal induction of antiviral interferon and inflammatory response, causing dampened innate-mediated control of viral replication and a failure to mature local antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Enhancement of innate-mediated inflammation in the vaginal mucosa rescues this phenotype and completely inhibits ZIKV replication. To gain a better understanding of how this dampened innate immune activation in the lower female reproductive tract may also affect adaptive immunity, we modeled CD8 T cell responses using vaginal LCMV infection. We show that the lack of APC maturation in the vaginal mucosa leads to a delay in CD8 T cell activation in the draining lymph node and hinders the timely appearance of effector CD8 T cells in vaginal mucosa, thus further delaying viral control in this tissue. Our study demonstrates that vaginal tissue is exceptionally vulnerable to infection by RNA viruses and provides a conceptual framework for the male to female sexual transmission observed during ZIKV infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据