4.4 Article

Metabolic and behavioral responses of the reef fish Patagonotothen cornucola to ultraviolet radiation: Influence of the diet

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2015.10.011

关键词

Ultraviolet radiation; Fish; Ultraviolet-absorbing compounds; Respiratory frequency; Prey capture time

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT-2011-0087]
  2. Fundacion Playa Union

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most of the studies devoted to assess the effects of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) on fishes have been done with early life stages (i.e., eggs and larvae) as they are the most vulnerable to these wavelengths; however, the effects of UVR on juveniles or adults are less clear. This study evaluated the effects of UVR and diet (i.e., rich and poor in ultraviolet-absorbing compounds; UVAC) on the metabolic rates (respiratory frequency) and behavior (prey capture time) of juveniles of the reef fish Patagonotothen cornucola, a common species inhabiting the intertidal areas of the Patagonian coast. UVR was a significant stress factor for P. cornucola by increasing its respiratory frequency, which could be related to the costs of repairing any cellular components damaged during the exposure. Fish exposed to UVR took more time to detect and capture their prey, which could lead to a reduction in the prey capture rates, with the concomitant effects on growth. In addition, juveniles feeding on rich-UVAC diet had a significant lower respiratory frequency than those feeding on poor-UVAC diet. This differential response was not evident in the prey capture time. In their natural environment, P. cornucola could feed on a varied diet and could also partially avoid the exposure to UVR by hiding under the rocks or macroalgae. Future studies should consider the broad variety of diets that could be found in rocky intertidal areas, and how their qualities (in terms of UVAC content) could help to counteract the UVR effects on juvenile fish. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据