Human-machine teaming is key to AI adoption: clinicians' experiences with a deployed machine learning system

While a growing number of machine learning (ML) systems have been deployed in clinical settings with the promise of improving patient care, many have struggled to gain adoption and realize this promise. Based on a qualitative analysis of coded interviews with clinicians who use an ML-based system for sepsis, we found that, rather than viewing the system as a surrogate for their clinical judgment, clinicians perceived themselves as partnering with the technology. Our findings suggest that, even without a deep understanding of machine learning, clinicians can build trust with an ML system through experience, expert endorsement and validation, and systems designed to accommodate clinicians' autonomy and support them across their entire workflow.

Automated summary

Clinicians perceive machine learning systems as partners rather than substitutes, and can build trust with them through experience, expert endorsement, and systems that support their autonomy.