4.5 Review

Monoclonal Antibodies for Pre- and Postexposure Prophylaxis of COVID-19: Review of the Literature

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11080882

关键词

monoclonal antibodies; COVID-19; prophylaxis

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health
  2. Esselunga S.p.A.
  3. Camera di Commercio, Industria e Artigianato di Roma
  4. Societa Numero Blu Servizi S.p.A.
  5. Fineco Bank S.p.A.
  6. Associazione magistrati della Corte dei conti
  7. Societa Mocerino Frutta Secca s.r.l. [395, 254, 257]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monoclonal antibodies are protein-based substances that mimic the immune system's ability to fight off viruses. They have been authorized for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19 in high-risk individuals. This review focuses on the therapeutic indications of monoclonal antibodies for pre- and postexposure prophylaxis and the effectiveness of convalescent plasma.
Monoclonal antibodies are laboratory-made proteins that mimic the immune system's ability to fight off harmful microorganisms, including viruses such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medical Agency (EMA) have already authorized monoclonal antibodies of anti-SARS-CoV-2 to treat mild to moderate CoronaVIrus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) in patients at risk of developing severe disease. More recently, monoclonal antibodies anti-SARS-CoV-2 have been authorized for primary and secondary prophylaxis in patients at high risk of severe disease for background comorbidity. Primary or pre-exposure prophylaxis prevents COVID-19 in unexposed people, whereas secondary or postexposure prophylaxis prevent COVID-19 in recently exposed people to individuals with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2. This review focuses briefly on therapeutic indications of currently available monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 pre- and postexposure prophylaxis and on the efficacy of convalescent plasma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据