Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences
出版年份 2022 全文链接
标题
Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences
作者
关键词
-
出版物
Royal Society Open Science
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -
出版商
The Royal Society
发表日期
2022-08-17
DOI
10.1098/rsos.220334
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists
- (2020) Jordan D. Dworkin et al. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
- RETRACTED ARTICLE: The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance
- (2020) Bedoor AlShebli et al. Nature Communications
- Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart’s Law in action
- (2019) Michael Fire et al. GigaScience
- Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations
- (2019) Erin C McKiernan et al. eLife
- Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia
- (2019) Colin A. Chapman et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Metamorphic Robustness Testing: Exposing Hidden Defects in Citation Statistics and Journal Impact Factors
- (2019) Zhi Quan Zhou et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability
- (2018) Björn Brembs Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Relationships between abstract features and methodological quality explained variations of social media activity derived from systematic reviews about psoriasis interventions
- (2018) J. Ruano et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals
- (2018) Michael H. K. Bendels et al. PLoS One
- Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure
- (2018) David Moher et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- R-squared for Bayesian regression models
- (2018) Andrew Gelman et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan
- (2017) Paul-Christian Bürkner Journal of Statistical Software
- Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
- (2017) Denes Szucs et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Bayesian Inference for Kendall’s Rank Correlation Coefficient
- (2016) Johnny van Doorn et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- The philosophy of Bayes factors and the quantification of statistical evidence
- (2016) Richard D. Morey et al. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- The natural selection of bad science
- (2016) Paul E. Smaldino et al. Royal Society Open Science
- A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology
- (2016) Alexander Etz et al. PLoS One
- Twitter Predicts Citation Rates of Ecological Research
- (2016) Brandon K. Peoples et al. PLoS One
- The arbitrariness of reviews, and advice for school administrators
- (2015) John Langford et al. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM
- Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics
- (2015) Diana Hicks et al. NATURE
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science
- (2014) Coosje L. S. Veldkamp et al. PLoS One
- The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power
- (2014) R. Chris Fraley et al. PLoS One
- Reputation and impact in academic careers
- (2014) A. M. Petersen et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
- (2013) Björn Brembs et al. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often
- (2012) CE Paiva et al. Clinics
- Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research
- (2010) Yassine Gargouri et al. PLoS One
- A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants
- (2010) Lutz Bornmann et al. PLoS One
- Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics
- (2009) Anne Gentil-Beccot et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The relationship between reviewers’ quality-scores and number of citations for papers published in the journal Physics in Medicine and Biology from 2003–2005
- (2009) Michael S. Patterson et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started