4.7 Article

Community established best practice recommendations for tephra studies-from collection through analysis

期刊

SCIENTIFIC DATA
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01515-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [ICER 1740669, ICER 1928341, EAR 1443393, ICER 1846400]
  2. International Union for Quaternary Research
  3. Center for Geohazards Studies, University at Buffalo
  4. U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Hazards Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tephra, a unique volcanic product, plays an unparalleled role in understanding past eruptions and the long-term behavior of volcanoes. Standardized data gathering and reporting can facilitate interdisciplinary communication and data sharing.
Tephra is a unique volcanic product with an unparalleled role in understanding past eruptions, long-term behavior of volcanoes, and the effects of volcanism on climate and the environment. Tephra deposits also provide spatially widespread, high-resolution time-stratigraphic markers across a range of sedimentary settings and thus are used in numerous disciplines (e.g., volcanology, climate science, archaeology). Nonetheless, the study of tephra deposits is challenged by a lack of standardization that inhibits data integration across geographic regions and disciplines. We present comprehensive recommendations for tephra data gathering and reporting that were developed by the tephra science community to guide future investigators and to ensure that sufficient data are gathered for interoperability. Recommendations include standardized field and laboratory data collection, reporting and correlation guidance. These are organized as tabulated lists of key metadata with their definition and purpose. They are system independent and usable for template, tool, and database development. This standardized framework promotes consistent documentation and archiving, fosters interdisciplinary communication, and improves effectiveness of data sharing among diverse communities of researchers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据