4.7 Article

Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/TiO2 double-deck membrane for vanadium redox flow battery application

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 783, 期 -, 页码 76-81

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.11.049

关键词

Vanadium redox flow battery; Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone); Titanium dioxide; Double-deck membrane

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21306119, 51602209]
  2. Provincial Nature Science Foundation of Sichuan [2013FZ034, 2013JY0150, 2016GZ0423]
  3. Outstanding Young Scientist Foundation of Sichuan University [2013SCU04A23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK)/TiO2 double-deck membrane which consists of a layer of SPEEK and a layer of TiO2 was prepared and investigated for vanadium redox flow battery (VRB) application for the first time. The physicochemical properties of the SPEEK/TiO2 membrane, including the water uptake, swelling ratio, ion exchange capacity, proton conductivity, VO2+ permeability and ion selectivity are evaluated in detail, compared to the pristine SPEEK membrane and Nafion 117 membrane. The scanning electron microscopy images reveal its double-deck structure and the structural stability with no delamination, and thermogravimetric analysis (TG) identifies its thermal stability. Among all membranes, the SPEEK/TiO2 double-deck membrane possesses lowest vanadium ion permeability (6.66 x 10(-7) cm(2) min(-1)) and highest ion selectivity (9.46 x 10(4) S min cm(-3)). The VRB single cell with SPEEK/FiO(2) double-deck membrane shows higher coulombic efficiency (97.0% vs 933%) and energy efficiency (85.8% vs 83.7%) compared to that with Nafion 117 membrane at 60 mA cm(-2). Furthermore, the SPEEK/TiO2 double-deck membrane exhibits highly stable cell performance after 60 times of cycling tests at 60 mA cm(-2) and lower capacity decay rate than that of Nafion 117 membrane. Therefore, the SPEEK/TiO2 double-deck membrane exhibits good potential usage in VRB systems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据