Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: A propensity score analysis in Japan

Background: Although the laparoscopic approach has been applied to distal pancreatectomy, its benefits with regard to the short-term outcomes of distal pancreatectomy remain unclear.Materials and methods: Using a Japanese nationwide inpatient database, we identified patients who underwent laparoscopic (n = 6647) and open (n = 21,843) distal pancreatectomy between July 2012 and March 2020. We conducted a 1:2 propensity score-matched analysis with adjustment for background characteristics (e.g., comorbidities, preoperative diagnosis, and hospital background) to compare in-hospital morbidity and mortality, reoperation requirement, duration of anesthesia and drainage, postoperative length of stay, and total hospital-ization costs. For sensitivity analyses, we performed overlap propensity score-weighted analysis, instrumental variable analysis, and subgroup analyses for hospital volume, patients with benign tumors, and those with malignant tumors that required splenectomy.Results: In-hospital morbidity and mortality were 27% and 0.7%, respectively. The 1:2 propensity score-matched analysis showed that compared to open surgery, laparoscopic surgery was significantly associated with lower in -hospital morbidity (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.78 [0.73 to 0.84]) and mortality (0.26 [0.14 to 0.50]), lower occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (0.78 [0.72 to 0.85]), postoperative bleeding (0.59 [0.51 to 0.69]), and reoperation (0.65 [0.58 to 0.75]), longer duration of anesthesia (difference, 59 [56 to 63] minutes), shorter duration of drainage (difference,-4.0 [-4.5 to-3.6] days) and postoperative length of stay (difference,-4.4 [-4.9 to-3.9] days), and lower total hospitalization costs (difference,-1510 [-1776 to-1243] US dollars). The sensitivity analyses showed compatible results with those from the main analysis.Conclusion: In this large nationwide cohort, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy showed lower in-hospital morbidity, mortality, and total hospitalization costs than open distal pancreatectomy. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy may be a favorable procedure in terms of both complications and costs.

Automated summary

This study compared the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. The results showed that laparoscopic surgery had lower in-hospital morbidity, mortality, and total hospitalization costs compared to open surgery.