4.2 Article

Implementation of Scale-Dependent Background-Error Covariance Localization in the Canadian Global Deterministic Prediction System

期刊

WEATHER AND FORECASTING
卷 37, 期 9, 页码 1567-1580

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-22-0055.1

关键词

Numerical weather prediction; forecasting; Operational forecasting; Data assimilation; Ensembles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the implementation of applying different amounts of horizontal localization to different ranges of background-error covariance horizontal scales in the GDPS global deterministic prediction system. Experiments and observational data are used to demonstrate the positive impacts of this approach on forecasts.
The approach of applying different amounts of horizontal localization to different ranges of background-error covariance horizontal scales as proposed by Buehner and Shlyaeva was recently implemented in the four-dimensional ensemble-variational (4DEnVar) data assimilation scheme of the global deterministic prediction system (GDPS) at Environment and Climate Change Canada operations. To maximize the benefits from this approach to reduce the sampling noise in the ensemble-derived background-error covariances, it was necessary to adopt a new weighting between the climatological and flow-dependent covariances that increases significantly the role of the latter. Thus, in December 2021 the GDPS became the first operational global deterministic medium-range weather forecasting system to rely completely on flow-dependent covariances in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere. The experiments that led to the adoption of these two related changes and their impacts on the forecasts up to 7 days for various regions of the globe during the boreal summer of 2019 and winter of 2020 are presented here. It is also illustrated that relying more on ensemble-derived covariances amplifies the positive impacts on the GDPS when the background ensemble generation strategy is improved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据