4.8 Article

The synergistic effect of calcite and Cu2+ on the degradation of sulfadiazine via PDS activation: A role of Cu(III)

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118529

关键词

Calcite; Peroxydisulfate (PDS); Cu redox cycle; Degradation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41772038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Cu2+/calcite/PDS system was constructed to degrade sulfadiazine (SDZ). Cu(III), formed from Cu2+ and calcite, was found to be the main reactive species responsible for the degradation of SDZ. CuCO3 was identified as the main complex with high reactivity for PDS activation. This study reveals the synergistic effect of Cu2+ and calcite on SDZ degradation and highlights the environmental benefits of natural calcite.
A system of Cu2+/calcite/PDS was constructed to degrade sulfadiazine (SDZ). Different from the traditional Cumediated activation, a low concentration of Cu2+ that met drinking water standards (<= 1 mg/L) transformed into Cu(II) solid in the presence of calcite, and then enhanced the degradation of SDZ via PDS activation over a pH range from 3 to 9. According to scavenger and chemical probe experiments, Cu(III), rather than radicals (hydroxyl radicals and sulfate radicals) and singlet oxygen, was the predominant reactive species, which was responsible for the degradation of SDZ. Based on the results of XRD, ATR-FTIR, and CV curves et al., CuCO3 was the main complex with high reactivity for PDS activation to form Cu(III). Moreover, detailed degradation pathways of sulfadiazine were proposed according to the UPLC-ESI-MS/MS and their toxicity was predicted by ECOSAR. Besides, the real water matrix would not seriously affect the degradation of SDZ in the Cu2+/calcite/ PDS system. In summary, this study reveals a new insight into the synergistic effect of Cu2+ and calcite on the SDZ degradation, and promotes an understanding of the environmental benefits of natural calcite.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据