4.4 Review

Transport model comparison studies of intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103962

关键词

Heavy-ion collisions; Intermediate energy; Transport theory; Transport codes; Nuclear equation-of-state

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11625521, U2032145, 11875125, 12147219, 11922514, 12135004, 11635003, 11025524, 11161130520, 11905302, 12175072, 11722546]
  2. National SKA Program of China [2020SKA0120300]
  3. US Department of Energy [DE-SC0019209, DE-SC0015266, DE-SC0013702, DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-SC0021235, DE-SC0014530, DE-NA0003908]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. Rare Isotope Science Project of Institute for Basic Science-Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013M7A1A1075764]
  7. Welch Foundation [A-1358]
  8. U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Science) [DE-SC0014530]
  9. CUSTIPEN (China- U.S. Theory Institute for Physics with Exotic Nuclei) under the US Department of Energy) [DE-SC0009971]
  10. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [24105008, 17K05432, 21K03528]
  11. US National Science Foundation [PHY-1565546]
  12. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [EXC-2094-390783311]
  13. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFE0202002]
  14. National Key Basic Research Development Program of China [2018YFA0404404]
  15. Continuous Basic Scientific Research Project, China [WDJC-2019-13, BJ20002501]
  16. Laboratori Nazionali del Sud (LNS) , INFN, Catania, Italy
  17. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT) [2016R1A5A1013277, 2018R1D1A1B07048599]
  18. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government ( Ministry of Education) [2016R1A5A1013277, 2018R1D1A1B07048599]
  19. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0019209, DE-SC0021235, DE-SC0013702] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transport models are used to obtain physics information on heavy-ion collisions. The Transport Model Evaluation Project aims to test the robustness of these models and find consistent conclusions. Six studies have been performed, showing convergence of results in box calculations, but differences in full heavy-ion collisions. Further comparisons are needed to improve transport simulations and validate the models.
Transport models are the main method to obtain physics information on the nuclear equation of state and in-medium properties of particles from low to relativistic-energy heavy-ion collisions. The Transport Model Evaluation Project (TMEP) has been pursued to test the robustness of transport model predictions in reaching consistent conclusions from the same type of physical model. To this end, calculations under controlled conditions of physical input and set-up were performed with various participating codes. These included both calculations of nuclear matter in a box with periodic boundary conditions, which test separately selected ingredients of a transport code, and more realistic calculations of heavy-ion collisions. Over the years, six studies have been performed within this project. In this intermediate review, we summarize and discuss the present status of the project. We also provide condensed descriptions of the 26 participating codes, which contributed to some part of the project. These include the major codes in use today. After a compact description of the underlying transport approaches, we review the main results of the studies completed so far. They show, that in box calculations the differences between the codes can be well understood and a convergence of the results can be reached. These studies also highlight the systematic differences between the two families of transport codes, known under the names of Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (BUU) and Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) type codes. However, when the codes were compared in full heavy-ion collisions using different physical models, as recently for pion production, they still yielded substantially different results. This calls for further comparisons of heavy-ion collisions with controlled models and of box comparisons of important ingredients, like momentum dependent fields, which are currently underway. Our evaluation studies often indicate improved strategies in performing transport simulations and thus can provide guidance to code developers. Results of transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions from a given code will have more significance if the code can be validated against benchmark calculations such as the ones summarized in this review.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据