4.5 Article

Estimation of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity from finger photoplethysmography signal

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
卷 43, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ac7a8e

关键词

aortic stiffness; finapres; MATLAB; PPG; cf-PWV

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared a new method to estimate cf-PWV with the gold-standard technique and found that including additional variables can improve the prediction performance, making predictions via MLR, linear SVM, and Exponential GPR acceptable to excellent.
Objective. This project compared a new method to estimate the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) to the gold-standard cf-PWV technique. Approach. The cf-PWV was estimated from the pulse transit time (FPS-PTT) calculated by processing the finger photoplethysmographic signal of Finapres (FPS) and subject's height only (brief mode) as well as along with other variables (age, heart rate, arterial pressure, weight; complete mode). Doppler ultrasound cf-PWVs and FPS-PTTs were measured in 90 participants equally divided into 3 groups (18-30; 31-59; 60-79 years). Predictions were performed using multiple linear regressions (MLR) and with the best regression model identified by using MATLAB Regression Learner App. A validation set approach (60 training datasets, 30 testing datasets; VSA) and leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) were used. Main results. With MLR, the discrepancies were: 0.01 +/- 1.21 m s(-1) (VSA) and 0.001 +/- 1.11 m s(-1) (LOOCV) in brief mode; -0.02 +/- 0.83 m s(-1) (VSA) and 0.001 +/- 0.84 m s(-1) (LOOCV) in complete mode. Using a linear support vector machine model (SVM) in brief mode, the discrepancies were: 0.01 +/- 1.19 m s(-1) (VSA) and -0.01 +/- 1.06 m s(-1) (LOOCV). Using an Exponential Gaussian process regression model (GPR) in complete mode, the discrepancies were: -0.03 +/- 0.79 m s(-1) (VSA) and 0.01 +/- 0.75 m s(-1) (LOOCV). Significance. The cf-PWV can be estimated by processing the FPS-PTT and subjects' height only, but the inclusion of other variables improves the prediction performance. Predictions through MLR qualify as acceptable in both brief and complete modes. Predictions via linear SVM in brief mode improve but still qualify as acceptable. Interestingly, predictions through Exponential GPR in complete mode improve and qualify as excellent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据