Are ape gestures like words? Outstanding issues in detecting similarities and differences between human language and ape gesture

Opinion piece: ape gestures are made intentionally, inviting parallels with human language; but how similar are their gestures to words? Here we ask this in three ways, considering: flexibility and ambiguity, first- and second-order intentionality, and usage in interactive exchanges. Many gestures are used to achieve several, often very distinct, goals. Such apparent ambiguity in meaning is potentially disruptive for communication, but-as with human language-situational and interpersonal context may largely resolve the intended meaning. Our evidence for first-order intentional use of gesture is abundant, but how might we establish a case for the second-order intentional use critical to language? Finally, words are rarely used in tidy signal-response sequences but are exchanged in back-and-forth interaction. Do gestures share this property? In this paper, we examine these questions and set out ways in which they can be resolved, incorporating data from wild chimpanzees.This article is part of the theme issue 'Cognition, communication and social bonds in primates'.

Automated summary

This article examines the similarities between ape gestures and human language, considering flexibility and ambiguity, first- and second-order intentionality, and usage in interactive exchanges. While gestures may have ambiguous meanings, situational and interpersonal context can resolve this ambiguity. The article also proposes methods to establish cases of second-order intentional use and whether gestures share the back-and-forth interaction property.