4.7 Article

Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the detection of Streptococcus agalactiae in bovine milk

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 99, 期 3, 页码 2142-2150

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-10073

关键词

bovine; loop-mediated isothermal amplification; mastitis; milk; Streptococcus agalactiae

资金

  1. University of Sydney Brown Equity Fellowship
  2. Geoffrey Gardiner Dairy Foundation (Melbourne, Australia) [INN-10-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Streptococcus agalactiae is a well-characterized bovine mastitis pathogen that is known to be highly contagious and capable of spreading rapidly in affected dairy herds. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a novel molecular diagnostic method that has the capability to provide rapid, cost-effective screening for pathogens to support on-farm disease control and eradication programs. In the current study, a LAMP test was developed to detect S. agalactiae in milk. The assay was validated on a bank of existing clinical mastitis milk samples that had previously been identified as S. agalactiae positive via traditional microbiological culture techniques and PCR. The LAMP assay was conducted on bacterial colonies and DNA extracted from milk in tube- and plate-based formats using multiple detection platforms. The 1-h assay conducted at 64 degrees C exhibited repeatability (coefficient of variation) of 2.07% (tube) and 8.3% (plate), sensitivity to similar to 20 pg of extracted DNA/reaction, and specificity against a panel of known bacterial mastitis pathogens. Of the 109 known S. agalactiae isolates assessed by LAMP directly from bacterial cells in culture, 108 were identified as positive, in accordance with PCR analysis. The LAMP analysis from the corresponding milk samples indicated that 104 of these milks exhibited a positive amplification curve. Although exhibiting some limitations, this assay provides an opportunity for rapid screening of milk samples to facilitate on-farm management of this pathogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据