4.7 Article

On the inconsistency of [C/Fe] abundances and the fractions of carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars among various stellar surveys

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2062

关键词

stars: abundances; stars: chemically peculiar; stars: Population II; techniques: spectroscopic; methods: data analysis

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [834148]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2021R1A2C1008679]
  4. ERC Starting Grant NEFERTITI [H2020/808240]
  5. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-18-CE31-0017]
  6. Dutch Research Council (NWO) [VI.Vidi.193.093]
  7. NOIRLab
  8. International Space Science Institute, Bern, Switzerland
  9. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [730890]
  10. ESO [095.D-0202(A), 096.D-0018(A), 097.D0196(A), 098.D0434(A), 099.D-0428(A)]
  11. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  12. U.S. Department of Energy
  13. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  14. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  15. Max Planck Society
  16. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  17. American Museum of Natural History
  18. Astrophysical Institute Potsdam
  19. University of Basel
  20. University of Cambridge
  21. Case Western Reserve University
  22. University of Chicago
  23. Drexel University
  24. Fermilab
  25. Institute for Advanced Study
  26. Japan Participation Group
  27. Johns Hopkins University
  28. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics
  29. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  30. Korean Scientist Group
  31. Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST)
  32. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  33. MaxPlanck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  34. Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  35. New Mexico State University
  36. Ohio State University
  37. University of Pittsburgh
  38. University of Portsmouth
  39. Princeton University
  40. United States Naval Observatory
  41. University of Washington
  42. National Development and Reform Commission
  43. [S/2017B/01]
  44. [A/2018A/01]
  45. [OPTICON 2018B/029]
  46. [OPTICON 2019A/045]
  47. [A/2020A/11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon enhanced metal-poor stars are valuable for Galactic archaeology, but comparing different literature samples reveals inconsistencies. Systematic differences in the analysis pipelines contribute to biases. Recommendations are provided to unlock the full potential of CEMP stars.
Carbon enhanced metal-poor (CEMP) stars are a unique resource for Galactic archaeology because they probe the properties of the First Stars, early chemical evolution, and binary interactions at very low metallicity. Comparing the fractions and properties of CEMP stars in different Galactic environments can provide us with unique insights into the formation and evolution of the Milky Way halo and its building blocks. In this work, we investigate whether directly comparing fractions of CEMP stars from different literature samples of very metal-poor ([Fe/H] < -2.0) stars is valid. We compiled published CEMP fractions and samples of Galactic halo stars from the past 25 years, and find that they are not all consistent with each other. Focusing on giant stars, we find significant differences between various surveys when comparing their trends of [Fe/H] versus [C/Fe] and their distributions of CEMP stars. To test the role of the analysis pipelines for low-resolution spectroscopic samples, we re-analysed giant stars from various surveys with the SSPP and FERRE pipelines. We found systematic differences in [C/Fe] of similar to 0.1-0.4 dex, partly independent of degeneracies with the stellar atmospheric parameters. These systematics are likely due to the different pipeline approaches, different assumptions in the employed synthetic grids, and/or the comparison of different evolutionary phases. We conclude that current biases in (the analysis of) very metal-poor samples limit the conclusions one can draw from comparing different surveys. We provide some recommendations and suggestions that will hopefully aid the community to unlock the full potential of CEMP stars for Galactic archaeology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据