4.6 Article

Fluorescent Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots for Label Live Elder Blood-Stage Plasmodium falciparum through New Permeability Pathways

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27134163

关键词

Plasmodium falciparum; nitrogen-doped carbon dots; new permeability pathways; flow cytometry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82072297]
  2. Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province [2019-YY-065]
  3. high-level talent support project of Yangzhou University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The size and emergence time of new permeability pathways (NPPs) in malaria parasites were verified. Nanomaterials with a particle size of about 50 nm showed higher efficiency in increasing the permeability of the host cell membrane during the maturation of NPPs. Nitrogen-doped carbon dots (NCDs) were found to be a novel nanomaterial that can specifically bind to malaria parasites and label live elder blood-stage P. falciparum through NPPs, indicating potential application in cell imaging. NPPs and nanomaterials like NCDs deserve more attention and exploration for malaria elimination and prevention.
To verify the size and emergence time of new permeability pathways (NPPs) in malaria parasites, the permeability of the Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes was tested with different particle sizes of nanomaterials by flow cytometry assay. The results confirmed the permeability of the host cell membrane increases with parasite maturation for the stage-development evolution of NPPs, and especially found that a particle size of about 50 nm had higher efficiency. As a kind of the novel nanomaterials, nitrogen-doped carbon dots (NCDs) showed no toxicity, specificity binding ability to the malaria parasites, and could label live elder blood-stage P. falciparum through NPPs, indicating the potential application in cell imaging. NPPs and some nanomaterials such as NCDs deserve more attention and exploration for the elimination and prevention of malaria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据