4.7 Article

Joint attention feature transfer network for gearbox fault diagnosis with imbalanced data

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109146

关键词

Attention mechanism; Feature transfer; Class prototypes; Imbalanced dataset; Gearbox fault diagnosis

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project [2020YFB1709800]
  2. Science and Technology Projects in Chongqing [cstc2019jcyj-zdxmX0026]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, a novel model JAFTN is proposed, which can achieve higher fault diagnosis accuracy in imbalanced datasets obtained from industrial field. This is achieved through the combination of feature extractor and feature transfer module.
Fault diagnosis methods based on deep learning have achieved remarkable success in the field of mechanical fault diagnosis. However, most data obtained in the industrial field come from imbalanced datasets, and traditional deep learning methods based on data balancing often achieve disappointing results, which limits their applications in different engineering scenarios. To solve this problem, a novel model called joint attention feature transfer network (JAFTN) is proposed. First, data are mapped to a feature space through a feature extractor that integrates a joint attention module, so as to keep the discrimination between different classes of features. After that, the constructed feature transfer module maintains the relation between different classes and transfers the common generalization representation obtained from other classes to the class with scarce samples, thereby enriching its feature space. Two gearbox fault diagnosis experiments from a test rig and an actual wind farm verify that the proposed JAFTN has higher fault diagnosis accuracy compared to several other popular imbalanced fault diagnosis methods. Meanwhile, the ablation study shows the effectiveness of each module.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据